Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Porn Deepfakes Sent to Casino-Opposed Illinois Dems by GOP Aide, Cops Say editorial policy.
  1. Palms Casino Owner Explains Nightclub Closure Decision, Red Rock Resorts Earnings Disappoint

Compare Accounts
×
Louisiana Sports Betting Tax Hike Proposal Meets Quick Death
Provider
Name
Description
Gypsy Champion: After Knocking Out Deontay Wilder in Rematch, What Awaits Tyson Fury?  Over 200 Pennsylvania Towns Tell Casinos They’re Not Welcome  Remembering the Las Vegas Strip’s Founding Mother  Arkansas Attorney General Assists Gaming Regulators on Pope Casino  Macau Regulators Meet With Junket Trade Group to Discuss Future VIP Operations  Pac-12 Conference Bringing Football Championship Game to Las Vegas Stadium for 2020, 2021 Seasons  Las Vegas Crime Round Up: Paris Las Vegas $50K In Fire Damage  Steve Wynn ‘Chinese Agent’ Case Back in Court as US Files Appeal  Mandalay Bay to Host Disgusting Food Museum (You’ve Been Warned) at October Vegas Food Expo  Aristocrat Leisure Likely to Consider Sizable Acquisitions, Says Fitch Ratings